Introduction:
Okay, folks, are you ready for the ultimate Korean Kombat? We know we sure are! In the left corner, we have the pebble blue Samsung Galaxy S III,
flaunting a 4.8-inch Super AMOLED HD display and a quad-core Exynos
processor, and in the right corner, dressed up in an all-white outfit,
we have the LG Optimus 4X HD, touting a 4.7-inch True HD display and a quad-core Tegra 3
processor. Wanna find out which one of these Android 4.0 high-ends is
superior? Then let's put them through their paces and find out!
Design:
With
smartphones like these, picking a clear winner in the design category
is a pretty tough call. It is certain, however, that both the LG Optimus
4X HD and the Samsung Galaxy S III look outstanding, just like a handset of this caliber should. We also appreciate that the two devices come with removable batteries and slots for microSD cards.
At the end of the day, stating which design team has done a better job depends on what your priorities are. The Galaxy S III feels a lot more user-friendly with its curved edges, slimmer profile, and smooth finish, not to mention that its hardware buttons are well-positioned considering the unit's dimensions.
The LG Optimus 4X HD (left) and the Samsung Galaxy S III (right)
|
On the other hand, the Optimus 4X HD is more compact, and the texture on its plastic back cover does not feel bad at all. Another advantage that LG's smartphone has is that it comes with a regular SIM card slot,
so switching from an older device will be pretty straightforward,
instead of having to get a Micro SIM replacement, as the case is with
the Galaxy S III.
Left sides
|
Right
|
Bottom
|
Top
|
The LG Optimus 4X HD (bottom) and the Samsung Galaxy S III (top)
|
Display:
The Samsung Galaxy S III sports a slightly bigger display
|
Interface:
The Samsung Galaxy S III and LG Optimus 4X HD come with Android 4.0 out
of the box, which is a must if a smartphone is to be suitable for the
high-end category. To no surprise, both companies have tweaked the
appearance of these two Android heavyweights with skins of their own,
yet Samsung's efforts have yielded better results.
The TouchWiz Nature UI,
as Samsung calls it, feels a bit more polished and designed with
attention to detail. You can place shortcuts on the lock screen for
convenience, and a whole bunch of additional apps and features have been
thrown in. But if you can live with an interface that is not as heavily
customized, or if you prefer third-party solutions from the Google Play
store, then the Optimus UI 3.0 will
do just fine. Overall, it feels just as snappy and retains most of the
traits that the stock Google experience is acclaimed for.
LG
Optimus UI is layered on top of Android 4.0 on the LG Optimus 4X HD
|
The
Samsung Galaxy S III comes with TouchWiz Nature UX on top of Android 4
ICS
|
On-screen keyboard:
No
matter which one of these two smartphones you pick, chances are you
will be delighted by its on-screen keyboard. Given the width of the
devices' displays, it is not surprising that in portrait mode, keys feel
well-distanced from one another, and typos are quite uncommon. But even
if you happen to tap the wrong letter, the auto-correct feature, which
is enabled on both devices, will take care of it.
The on-screen keyboard of the LG Optimus 4X HD
|
The on-screen keyboard of the Samsung Galaxy S III
|
Internet Browser:
We
have absolutely no complaints about the stock browsers on either the
Samsung Galaxy S III or the LG Optimus 4X HD. Anything that you need in
order to enjoy the web to its fullest is present on these devices,
namely the support for Adobe Flash, the seamless text reflow, and the
buttery-smooth navigation, not to mention that web pages look pretty
nice when rendered across all that display real estate.
The browser on the LG Optimus 4X HD is very smooth
|
The Samsung Galaxy S III is presenting us to a brilliant web browser
|
Processor and memory:
Pitting
the LG Optimus 4X HD against the Samsung Galaxy S III is like having a
drag race between a Ferrari and a Lamborghini. No matter the winner, you
still have one mighty piece of hardware on your hands. But if synthetic
benchmarks is what you trust, the Galaxy S III with its quad-core Exynos processor seems to have the upper hand. The Optimus 4X HD, however, with its quad-core Tegra 3 chip, does not trail far behind.
Quadrant Standard | AnTuTu | NenaMark 2 | |
LG Optimus 4X HD | 3742 | 11184 | 52 |
Samsung Galaxy S III | 5335 | 12016 | 58,6 |
These
noteworthy scores are complemented by excellent real-life performance
under almost any circumstances. Apps launch in the blink of an eye, and
virtually no lag exists when switching between tasks, which should come
as no surprise since each one of these two smartphones has been given 1GB of RAM. All in all, performance under every-day conditions is top-notch with both the LG Optimus 4X HD and the Samsung Galaxy S III.
Camera:
It
is a bright, sunny day here – perfect weather conditions for these two
smartphones to show what their 8-megapixel cameras can do! Well, the
results are in, and in our opinion, the Samsung Galaxy S III is a more
capable shooter than the LG Optimus 4X HD.
Yet that is not because it takes better photos. In fact, both
smartphones take photos of above average quality, under outdoor and
indoor lighting conditions, but nothing that you would want to exhibit
in an art gallery.
What makes us go with the S III,
however, is its much greater set of features, with a burst shot mode
capable of taking 20 full-resolution photos faster than you can say
“gherkins”. Besides, it has a wider field of view, meaning you can
capture a “bigger” picture without being too far from the object. The
panorama mode works pretty good as well, and a camera shutter lag is
non-existent. In contrast, the 4X HD takes terrible panorama pictures
and it has a bit of a hard time locking the focus on objects. Last but
not least, the S III's camera can be conveniently launched straight from
the lock screen, unlike on the Optimus 4X HD.
LG Optimus 4X HD
| |||
Samsung Galaxy S III
| |||
HDR
| |||
LG Optimus 4X HD
| |||
HDR
| |||
Samsung Galaxy S III
Outdoor samples |
When it comes to shooting 1080p video,
the Samsung Galaxy S III dominates with its clear, detail-rich footage.
Video taken with the Optimus 4X HD looks quite unimpressive, despite
its high resolution.
Multimedia:
We are surprised to see that the music players on
the LG Optimus 4X HD and the Samsung Galaxy S III share the same
drawback, namely that neither of them has playback controls on the lock
screen. Other than that, they come with any feature you might expect,
such as a home screen widget, controls in the drop-down menu, and an
equalizer. Their interfaces look mostly stock, but we find nothing wrong
with keeping things simple. Overall, no matter which smartphone you
choose to be your music player, the experience will be identical.
Music playback on the LG Optimus 4X HD
|
The built-in music player of the Samsung Galaxy S III
|
In-call audio quality:
There
is a pretty good loudspeaker on the S III's back, but the one on the
Optimus 4X HD does not impress with its volume. We played back the same
YouTube video simultaneously on the two devices and the sounds coming
out from the S III could be heard a lot easier. At least the stock
ringtones sound equally loud on both smartphones.
Battery life:
Battery
life should not be an issue with either of these smartphones. The
Samsung Galaxy S III comes with a 2100mAh battery, while the Optimus 4X
HD is equipped with an even larger 2,150mAh cell. Both handsets are
capable of delivering over 11 hours of continuous talk-time on 3G and
should last for over a month on stand-by. Furthermore, a full charge
should be more than enough to last you through a day of moderate usage.
Conclusion:
No comments:
Post a Comment